CANARA BANK ARSIKERE BRANCH (REP. BY ITS MANAGER RAGHU) vs H.B. RAGHU SON OF BASAVARAJU — 540/2021

Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 Section 7,RULE,1,READWITH,26,OF,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS410037792021

Filing Number

540/2021

Filing Date

09-Nov-2021

Registration No

540/2021

Registration Date

09-Nov-2021

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE

Judge

345-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DECREED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 7 Rule 1 Section 7,RULE,1,READWITH,26,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CANARA BANK ARSIKERE BRANCH (REP. BY ITS MANAGER RAGHU)

    Adv. K.V.HIRIYANNA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.H.B. RAGHU SON OF BASAVARAJU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Judgment

    Summary of Case 540/2021 The court decreed Canara Bank's suit for loan recovery partly in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant, who obtained a Rs. 5 lakh vehicle loan in 2017 but defaulted on repayment, was ordered to pay Rs. 4,82,237 with 8% p.a. interest until decree and 6% thereafter, rejecting the bank's claimed 10.30% interest rate due to leniency considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Judgement.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  5. 03-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  8. 13-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  10. 23-Sep-2025

    Notice

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  11. 12-Jul-2025

    Notice

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  12. 30-Jun-2025

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  13. 08-Mar-2025

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  14. 25-Feb-2025

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  15. 13-Feb-2025

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  16. 29-Jan-2025

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  17. 07-Jan-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  18. 14-Dec-2024

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  19. 27-Nov-2024

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  20. 15-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  21. 12-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  22. 19-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  23. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  24. 14-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  25. 03-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  26. 02-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  27. 09-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  28. 18-Aug-2023

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  29. 08-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  30. 26-May-2023

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  31. 11-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  32. 19-Jan-2023

    A.D.R.

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  33. 09-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  34. 20-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  35. 10-Aug-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  36. 11-Jul-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  37. 27-May-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  38. 11-Mar-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  39. 11-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

  40. 10-Nov-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 09-Nov-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 540/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 540/2021 The court decreed Canara Bank's suit for loan recovery partly in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant, who obtained a Rs. 5 lakh vehicle loan in 2017 but defaulted on repayment, was ordered to pay Rs. 4,82,237 with 8% p.a. interest until decree and 6% thereafter, rejecting the bank's claimed 10.30% interest rate due to leniency considerations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case