RAMAKRISHNA G.L. ALIAS RAMANNA SON OF LATE LAKKAPPA vs MANJUNATHA .M.R. SON OF RAMAKRISHNA G.L. — 632/2021
Case under U/s 125 of Cr.p.c Section 125,OF,CRPC. Status: Summons. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS410030592021
Filing Number
632/2021
Filing Date
14-Sep-2021
Registration No
632/2021
Registration Date
14-Sep-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE
Judge
346-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAKRISHNA G.L. ALIAS RAMANNA SON OF LATE LAKKAPPA
Adv. A.G. DEVARAJEGOWDA
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANJUNATHA .M.R. SON OF RAMAKRISHNA G.L.
-
2.SUDHA T.A. WIFE OF MANJUNATHA M.R.
Case History
-
20-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
23-Jun-2026
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2026
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Dec-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Aug-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jun-2025
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Apr-2025
Summons
-
26-Apr-2025
Summons
-
12-Mar-2025
Summons
-
21-Jan-2025
Summons
-
30-Nov-2024
Summons
-
10-Oct-2024
Summons
-
29-Aug-2024
Summons
-
29-Jul-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-May-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Mar-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2024
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2023
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Nov-2023
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Oct-2023
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2023
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Aug-2023
Summons
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jul-2023
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Jun-2023
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Apr-2023
Orders
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 632/2021 Outcome: The petition was dismissed as not maintainable. Ramakrishna G.L. filed a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance petition seeking Rs. 20,000 monthly from his son (Manjunatha M.R.) and daughter-in-law (Sudha T.A.), claiming inability to self-maintain. The court held that while a parent may claim maintenance from a son under Section 125, a parent has no legal right to claim maintenance from a daughter-in-law. Since the petition against Respondent No. 2 (daughter-in-law) was not statutorily permissible, it was dismissed on grounds of being unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2023
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Apr-2023
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2023
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
17-Feb-2023
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jan-2023
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Dec-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Sep-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jul-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Jun-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jun-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-May-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2022
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Apr-2022
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Mar-2022
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2022
Orders
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2022
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2022
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
28-Dec-2021
Hearing
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Nov-2021
Notice
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Oct-2021
Rejection Of Plaint
I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Sep-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 632/2021
Case Summary: Crl. Misc. 632/2021 Outcome: The petition was dismissed as not maintainable. Ramakrishna G.L. filed a Section 125 Cr.P.C. maintenance petition seeking Rs. 20,000 monthly from his son (Manjunatha M.R.) and daughter-in-law (Sudha T.A.), claiming inability to self-maintain. The court held that while a parent may claim maintenance from a son under Section 125, a parent has no legal right to claim maintenance from a daughter-in-law. Since the petition against Respondent No. 2 (daughter-in-law) was not statutorily permissible, it was dismissed on grounds of being unmaintainable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts