NAGARAJU S.O SIDDEGOWDA vs BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR — 388/2026

Case under Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 10,AND,13B. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS410009162026

Filing Number

388/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

388/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE

Judge

345-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

25-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Registration of Births and Deaths Rules, 1999 Section 10,AND,13B

Petitioner(s)

1.NAGARAJU S.O SIDDEGOWDA

Adv. ASURABHI
2.SIDDEGOWDA S.O LATE HALKUREGOWDA
3.GOWRAMMA W.O SIDDEGOWDA
4.NILAMMA W.O NAGARAJU

Respondent(s)

1.BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
25-Jun-2026

Orders

Case Summary: Crl.Mis.No. 388/2026 The court granted the petitioners' petition to register the death of Lakkegowda (dated 24.12.2021) and issue a death certificate. The petitioners needed the certificate to obtain a genealogical tree and had complied with High Court guidelines under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969, including newspaper publication and providing supporting documents. With no objections from the respondent registrar or public objectors, the court found sufficient evidence through petitioner testimony and directed the registrar to register the death and issue the certificate upon fee collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
25-Jun-2026

Disposed

Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
05-Jun-2026

Orders

Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
26-May-2026

Evidence.

Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
27-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
26-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 388/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Crl.Mis.No. 388/2026 The court granted the petitioners' petition to register the death of Lakkegowda (dated 24.12.2021) and issue a death certificate. The petitioners needed the certificate to obtain a genealogical tree and had complied with High Court guidelines under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969, including newspaper publication and providing supporting documents. With no objections from the respondent registrar or public objectors, the court found sufficient evidence through petitioner testimony and directed the registrar to register the death and issue the certificate upon fee collection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.