PARVATHAMMA W/O VENKATESHA vs TAHASILDAR — 325/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 10,13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 25th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS410007712026
Filing Number
325/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
325/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE
Judge
345-Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
25-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PARVATHAMMA W/O VENKATESHA
Adv. MANJUNATHA B M
-
2.THIMMAPPA S/O LATE.SIDDAPPA
-
3.LOLAKSHI W/O THIMMAPPA
-
4.MAMATHA D/O SOMASHEKHARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHASILDAR
-
2.CONCERNED PERSON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Jun-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 325/2026 The Principal Civil Judge at Arsikere allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Siddappa S/o Pandlugurappa (occurring on 04.11.1984) and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners had complied with High Court guidelines by producing a non-availability certificate, genealogical tree, newspaper publications, and credible witness testimony, with no objections raised by the respondent or public objectors. The court held that registration entries are not conclusive proof and that the petitioners' need for the certificate to obtain genealogical records (not litigation) was legitimate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jun-2026
Orders
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Notice
Prl.civil Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 325/2026
Case Summary: 325/2026 The Principal Civil Judge at Arsikere allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act, 1969, directing the Tahasildar to register the death of Siddappa S/o Pandlugurappa (occurring on 04.11.1984) and issue a death certificate. The court found the petitioners had complied with High Court guidelines by producing a non-availability certificate, genealogical tree, newspaper publications, and credible witness testimony, with no objections raised by the respondent or public objectors. The court held that registration entries are not conclusive proof and that the petitioners' need for the certificate to obtain genealogical records (not litigation) was legitimate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts