Lakshmidevi vs Rathnamma — 370/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 R 1. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS400014192025

Filing Number

370/2025

Filing Date

12-Sep-2025

Registration No

370/2025

Registration Date

12-Sep-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE

Judge

344-Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lakshmidevi

    Adv. Shashikumar A S

  2. 2.Sharadamma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rathnamma

  2. 2.Srinivasa

  3. 3.Paramesh

  4. 4.C M Suresh

  5. 5.C.M. Rangaswmy

  6. 6.Jayashankar

    Adv. Prakash.B.M

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 02-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 15-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 370/2025 Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA.No.I) and granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants No.1-6 from alienating, mortgaging, transferring, or creating charges over the disputed ancestral joint family properties. Plaintiffs Lakshmidevi and Sharadamma sought partition and separate possession, alleging defendants unlawfully changed property records and sold assets without their knowledge. The court found sufficient grounds to prevent property transfer to avoid defeating the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 15-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 12-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 370/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 370/2025 Summary: The court allowed the interim application (IA.No.I) and granted an ex-parte temporary injunction restraining defendants No.1-6 from alienating, mortgaging, transferring, or creating charges over the disputed ancestral joint family properties. Plaintiffs Lakshmidevi and Sharadamma sought partition and separate possession, alleging defendants unlawfully changed property records and sold assets without their knowledge. The court found sufficient grounds to prevent property transfer to avoid defeating the suit's purpose. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case