Sushilamma W/o Late Shankaraiah vs A.S. Jagadish S/o Late Shankaraiah Advocate - N SUBRAMANYASWAMY — 23/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 R 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 04th July 2026.

Arguments Next hearing 04-Jul-2026

R.A. - Regular Appeals

CNR: KAHS400005772024

Filing Number

23/2024

Filing Date

29-May-2024

Registration No

23/2024

Registration Date

29-May-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE

Judge

344-Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 41 R 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sushilamma W/o Late Shankaraiah

    Adv. J.MP

  2. 2.A. S. Vimala W/o Late H.S. Siddamalaiah

  3. 3.A.S. Sujath W/o Paramashivaiah

  4. 4.A.S. Kalpana W/o Veeresh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.A.S. Jagadish S/o Late Shankaraiah Advocate - N SUBRAMANYASWAMY

Case History

  1. 04-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  7. 16-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  8. 08-Dec-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  9. 26-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  11. 15-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of Case R.A. 23/2024 On 15-10-2025, witness testimony was recorded in this appeal. The respondent's counsel argued that he resides with his daughters and bears no ill-will toward the opposing party (his son who abandoned the family 3 years ago). The respondent stated he agreed to a settlement in civil court and was ready for reconciliation, though disputes arose regarding settlement implementation and alleged sale of jointly-owned assets. The court recorded the witness's testimony and adjourned the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  13. 20-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

  14. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  15. 23-Aug-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  17. 29-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  18. 16-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  19. 04-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  20. 06-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  22. 22-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  23. 11-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  24. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  25. 25-Jan-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  26. 25-Jan-2025

    A.D.R

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  27. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  28. 11-Dec-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  29. 26-Nov-2024

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  30. 04-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  31. 04-Nov-2024

    Arguments

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  32. 30-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  33. 28-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  34. 14-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  35. 05-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Addl. CJM

  36. 21-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 29-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 23/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case R.A. 23/2024 On 15-10-2025, witness testimony was recorded in this appeal. The respondent's counsel argued that he resides with his daughters and bears no ill-will toward the opposing party (his son who abandoned the family 3 years ago). The respondent stated he agreed to a settlement in civil court and was ready for reconciliation, though disputes arose regarding settlement implementation and alleged sale of jointly-owned assets. The court recorded the witness's testimony and adjourned the case for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case