ARKALGUD POLICE vs ANNAIAH — 665/2019

Case under Under Section 323 of Ipc Section 326, 354 R/w 34. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 23-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHS310020512019

Filing Number

664/2019

Filing Date

23-Sep-2019

Registration No

665/2019

Registration Date

23-Sep-2019

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD

Judge

347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

ARAKALGUD PS

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Under Section 323 of Ipc Section 326, 354 R/w 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARKALGUD POLICE

    Adv. A P P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANNAIAH

  2. 2.LAKSHMAMMA

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 665/2019 - Arkalgud Police v. Annaiah and Lakshmamma The case involves allegations of assault against the respondents (Annaiah and Lakshmamma). The witness testified on 20.06.2026 regarding an incident on 18.05.2018 where the victim allegedly suffered broken teeth, neck injuries, and torn clothing. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting contradictions and suggesting the victim initiated the land dispute. The court recorded witness testimony, physical evidence (two teeth marked as MO1 and MO2, and a stone as MO2), and examined conflicting accounts regarding land ownership and the actual assault. The proceedings concluded with testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 23-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 25-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 30-Dec-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 21-Nov-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 10-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  21. 10-Oct-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 30-Aug-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 26-Jun-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 25-Mar-2024

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 20-Jan-2024

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 20-Dec-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 24-Nov-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 04-Nov-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 21-Sep-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence.

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 16-Jun-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 20-Mar-2023

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 28-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 17-Nov-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 06-Oct-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 24-Aug-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 15-Jul-2022

    NBW To Accused

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 04-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 25-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 07-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 30-Dec-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 19-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 30-Oct-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 02-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 16-Jun-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 21-Apr-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 25-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 26-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 15-Jan-2021

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 18-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 04-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 07-Nov-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 17-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 28-Aug-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 10-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 05-Jun-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 05-May-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 16-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 05-Mar-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 23-Jan-2020

    ChargeView PDF

  63. 23-Jan-2020

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 28-Nov-2019

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  65. 24-Sep-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 23-Sep-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  67. 23-Sep-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 665/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 665/2019 - Arkalgud Police v. Annaiah and Lakshmamma The case involves allegations of assault against the respondents (Annaiah and Lakshmamma). The witness testified on 20.06.2026 regarding an incident on 18.05.2018 where the victim allegedly suffered broken teeth, neck injuries, and torn clothing. During cross-examination, the defense counsel challenged the witness's credibility, highlighting contradictions and suggesting the victim initiated the land dispute. The court recorded witness testimony, physical evidence (two teeth marked as MO1 and MO2, and a stone as MO2), and examined conflicting accounts regarding land ownership and the actual assault. The proceedings concluded with testimony recorded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case