The PSI, Konanuru Police, Arakalagud Taluk. vs Nagendra P.N. aliyas Manju aliyas Manohara, K.A.02P2692 Omni Car Driver. Advocate - DINESHA M.C. — 490/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s279,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th September 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAHS310011042022
Filing Number
490/2022
Filing Date
09-May-2022
Registration No
490/2022
Registration Date
09-May-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
1042-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0051
Police Station
KONANUR PS
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The PSI, Konanuru Police, Arakalagud Taluk.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nagendra P.N. aliyas Manju aliyas Manohara, K.A.02P2692 Omni Car Driver. Advocate - DINESHA M.C.
Case History
-
08-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-Jul-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Mar-2026
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2025
Deposition
Case 490/2022 Summary Court: First Additional Civil Judge & Sessions Court, Arakalagud Taluk Parties: PSI, Konanuru Police (Petitioner) vs. Nagendra P.N. alias Manju alias Manohara, Omni Car Driver (Respondent) Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a vehicle (KA-02-P-2692) seized on 07.03.2022 between 11:00-11:30 AM. The respondent's counsel challenged the witness credibility under Section 11(b), questioning the witness's knowledge about the seizure details and procedures. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed treating the witness as hostile. The case proceedings involved examination of documentary evidence and cross-examination of witnesses regarding the circumstances of the vehicle seizure. The judgment was pending further adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jul-2025
Deposition
-
29-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-May-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Feb-2025
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Dec-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Sep-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Jul-2024
Deposition
-
06-Jul-2024
Deposition
-
06-Jul-2024
Deposition
-
06-Jul-2024
Deposition
-
06-Jul-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Mar-2024
Deposition
-
06-Mar-2024
Deposition
-
06-Mar-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Feb-2024
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Dec-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Nov-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Sep-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jul-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Apr-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Mar-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jan-2023
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Dec-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Nov-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2022
Plea
-
19-Sep-2022
Evidence
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Aug-2022
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Aug-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jun-2022
Appearance Of Accussed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-May-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-May-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 490/2022
Case 490/2022 Summary Court: First Additional Civil Judge & Sessions Court, Arakalagud Taluk Parties: PSI, Konanuru Police (Petitioner) vs. Nagendra P.N. alias Manju alias Manohara, Omni Car Driver (Respondent) Outcome: The court examined witness testimony regarding a vehicle (KA-02-P-2692) seized on 07.03.2022 between 11:00-11:30 AM. The respondent's counsel challenged the witness credibility under Section 11(b), questioning the witness's knowledge about the seizure details and procedures. The Additional Public Prosecutor opposed treating the witness as hostile. The case proceedings involved examination of documentary evidence and cross-examination of witnesses regarding the circumstances of the vehicle seizure. The judgment was pending further adjudication on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts