SANNATHAYAMMA vs THE CHIEF OFFICER BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR ARAKALAGUDU — 313/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 26th May 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS310009602026
Filing Number
313/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
313/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANNATHAYAMMA
Adv. SHANKARAIAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE CHIEF OFFICER BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR ARAKALAGUDU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Sannathayamma v. The Chief Officer Birth and Death Registrar Arakalgud (CRL.MISC. 313/2026) Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to register the death of Sannathayamma's husband, Mr. Eraji (deceased 03.02.2000), in the death register and issue a death extract. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, genealogy affidavit, newspaper publication calling for objections (to which none were received), and identity documents establishing the husband's existence and death date, despite the respondent's absence during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-May-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-May-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 313/2026
Case Summary: Sannathayamma v. The Chief Officer Birth and Death Registrar Arakalgud (CRL.MISC. 313/2026) Decision: The court allowed the petition and directed the respondent to register the death of Sannathayamma's husband, Mr. Eraji (deceased 03.02.2000), in the death register and issue a death extract. The court found sufficient evidence through the petitioner's testimony, genealogy affidavit, newspaper publication calling for objections (to which none were received), and identity documents establishing the husband's existence and death date, despite the respondent's absence during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts