DEVAMMA vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 285/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS310008682026

Filing Number

285/2026

Filing Date

17-Mar-2026

Registration No

285/2026

Registration Date

17-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD

Judge

347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.DEVAMMA

Adv. GIRISHA.
2.PARVATHI

Adv. GIRISHA.
3.NANJEGOWDA

Adv. GIRISHA.
4.KRISHNEGOWDA

Adv. GIRISHA.

Respondent(s)

1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
15-Jun-2026

OrdersView PDF

The court allowed the petition filed by Devamma, Parvathi, and Nanjegowda seeking delayed registration of the death of Mr. Ankegowda (son/brother of the petitioners) who died on 20.03.2004. The petitioners had failed to formally register the death within the statutory period, believing oral notification was sufficient. The court, satisfied by oral testimony, genealogy affidavit, newspaper publication (which called for objections with none received), and the respondent's default, directed the Tahasildar to register the death and issue a death extract upon collection of fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-Jun-2026

Disposed

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
06-Jun-2026

Orders

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
25-May-2026

Orders

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
25-Apr-2026

Evidence

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
18-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petition filed by Devamma, Parvathi, and Nanjegowda seeking delayed registration of the death of Mr. Ankegowda (son/brother of the petitioners) who died on 20.03.2004. The petitioners had failed to formally register the death within the statutory period, believing oral notification was sufficient. The court, satisfied by oral testimony, genealogy affidavit, newspaper publication (which called for objections with none received), and the respondent's default, directed the Tahasildar to register the death and issue a death extract upon collection of fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.