GANESHA vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 149/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS310005092026
Filing Number
149/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
149/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GANESHA
Adv. GIRISHA.
-
2.RANGASWAMY
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Orders
Case Summary: 149/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of their father, Mr. Ramegowda S/o Late Kengegowda, as occurring on 30.03.1997 at Hebbale village, Arakalgud Taluk, and issue a death certificate upon collection of requisite fees. The petitioners had delayed reporting the death, believing oral notification was sufficient, but needed the death certificate for property transfer and government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2026
Case Summary: 149/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of their father, Mr. Ramegowda S/o Late Kengegowda, as occurring on 30.03.1997 at Hebbale village, Arakalgud Taluk, and issue a death certificate upon collection of requisite fees. The petitioners had delayed reporting the death, believing oral notification was sufficient, but needed the death certificate for property transfer and government benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts