MANJEGOWDA vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 131/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS310004682026

Filing Number

131/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

131/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD

Judge

347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3)

Petitioner(s)

1.MANJEGOWDA

Adv. CHANDRAPPA S.R.
2.DHARMA

Respondent(s)

1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
11-Jun-2026

OrdersView PDF

Case Summary: 131/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register the delayed death of Mrs. Puttagowramma (mother of petitioner No.1 and mother-in-law of petitioner No.2) who died on 06.10.2013. The court found that the petitioners had mistakenly believed oral notification to authorities was sufficient and accepted the genealogy affidavit, Aadhar cards, and unchallenged testimony of petitioner No.1 as proof of death. The Tahasildar was directed to register the death and issue a death extract upon collection of necessary fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
11-Jun-2026

Disposed

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
26-May-2026

Orders

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
15-Apr-2026

Evidence

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
18-Mar-2026

Evidence

Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
11-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
11-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 131/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 131/2026 The court allowed the petitioners' petition under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, to register the delayed death of Mrs. Puttagowramma (mother of petitioner No.1 and mother-in-law of petitioner No.2) who died on 06.10.2013. The court found that the petitioners had mistakenly believed oral notification to authorities was sufficient and accepted the genealogy affidavit, Aadhar cards, and unchallenged testimony of petitioner No.1 as proof of death. The Tahasildar was directed to register the death and issue a death extract upon collection of necessary fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.