MANJEGOWDA vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 130/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 11th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS310004672026
Filing Number
130/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
130/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJEGOWDA
Adv. CHANDRAPPA S.R.
-
2.DHARMA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed by Manjegowda and Dharma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, seeking to register the death of Venkatesha (brother of Manjegowda and father of Dharma) who died on 14.12.1994. The petitioners needed the death certificate for property transfer purposes but discovered the death had never been formally registered. Based on the petitioner's oral testimony, genealogy affidavit, and supporting documents, combined with the respondent's failure to contest the petition, the court directed the Tahsildar to register the death in the death register and issue a death extract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 130/2026
Summary: The court allowed the petition filed by Manjegowda and Dharma under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, seeking to register the death of Venkatesha (brother of Manjegowda and father of Dharma) who died on 14.12.1994. The petitioners needed the death certificate for property transfer purposes but discovered the death had never been formally registered. Based on the petitioner's oral testimony, genealogy affidavit, and supporting documents, combined with the respondent's failure to contest the petition, the court directed the Tahsildar to register the death in the death register and issue a death extract. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts