AVVAYYAMMA vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 127/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 29th April 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS310004612026
Filing Number
127/2026
Filing Date
10-Feb-2026
Registration No
127/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
347-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
29-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AVVAYYAMMA
Adv. SANTHOSHA P.R.
-
2.PREMA
-
3.VINODA
-
4.RAVI
-
5.RAKSHITHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
29-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: 127/2026 The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Mrs. Akkayyamma W/o Moganna, who died on 13.05.1982, in the death register and issue a death certificate. The petitioners needed this certificate to transfer property and access government benefits. The court accepted oral testimony and genealogy documents proving the petitioners' relationship to the deceased, and since no objections were raised and the respondent failed to appear, the court granted the delayed registration under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 127/2026
Case Summary: 127/2026 The court allowed the petition and directed the Tahsildar to register the death of Mrs. Akkayyamma W/o Moganna, who died on 13.05.1982, in the death register and issue a death certificate. The petitioners needed this certificate to transfer property and access government benefits. The court accepted oral testimony and genealogy documents proving the petitioners' relationship to the deceased, and since no objections were raised and the respondent failed to appear, the court granted the delayed registration under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts