RAMAD BI vs THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU — 29/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section U/sec.13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS310000962026
Filing Number
29/2026
Filing Date
12-Jan-2026
Registration No
29/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARAKALGUD
Judge
1042-I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
13-Jul-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAD BI
Adv. SHANKARAIAH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THAHASILDAR BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR TALUK OFFICE ARAKALAGUDU
-
2.AMEENA BI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Jul-2026
Orders
Case Summary: Ramad Bee v. Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar The court allowed petitioner Ramad Bee's petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act 1969 for delayed registration of her father Sri. Saabjan Saab's death, which occurred on 18-04-1980. The registrar had failed to register the death despite oral intimation and later issued a non-availability certificate instead of a death certificate, needed for property deed changes. Finding credible evidence through the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and supporting documents, the court directed the registrar to register the death and issue a death certificate upon fee collection, with the caveat that the entry is not conclusive proof and remains subject to dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Jul-2026
Disposed
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jun-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence.
I Addl CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 29/2026
Case Summary: Ramad Bee v. Tahasildar Birth and Death Registrar The court allowed petitioner Ramad Bee's petition under Section 13(3) of the Birth and Death Registration Act 1969 for delayed registration of her father Sri. Saabjan Saab's death, which occurred on 18-04-1980. The registrar had failed to register the death despite oral intimation and later issued a non-availability certificate instead of a death certificate, needed for property deed changes. Finding credible evidence through the petitioner's unchallenged testimony and supporting documents, the court directed the registrar to register the death and issue a death certificate upon fee collection, with the caveat that the entry is not conclusive proof and remains subject to dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts