ALUR PS vs SHASHI Advocate - M.S. MAHESH — 597/2016

Case under U/s.323 324 of Ipc Section 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAHS200011232016

Filing Number

597/2016

Filing Date

21-Jul-2016

Registration No

597/2016

Registration Date

21-Jul-2016

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s.323 324 of Ipc Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALUR PS (Police Station)

    Adv. A.P.P

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHASHI Advocate - M.S. MAHESH

  2. 2.HARISH KUMARA @ KUMAR

    Adv. T.S. SHANKAR

  3. 3.GANESHA

    Adv. H.D.MADHU

  4. 4.CHANDRAPPA

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 09-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Issues.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 06-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 09-Jan-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: CC 597/16 This criminal case involved assault allegations where a 51-year-old male worker was brought to Aluru hospital on 23.03.2016 at 12:05 PM with multiple lacerated wounds on the chest, abdomen, and limbs (2-5 cm). Medical evidence (MLC) indicated injuries consistent with sharp weapon (knife/rod) attack. After examining witness testimony and medical evidence, the court found the evidence insufficient to establish the identity of the assailant. The case was dismissed/concluded with no further cross-examination warranted, as the prosecution failed to prove the accusations beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 17-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 23-Jun-2025

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 01-Feb-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 30-Oct-2024

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 03-Oct-2024

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 18-Jul-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 16-Apr-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 18-Jan-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 19-Oct-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 14-Jul-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 24-Mar-2023

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 27-Dec-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 27-Oct-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 30-Jun-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 28-Apr-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 20-Jan-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 01-Dec-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 18-Sep-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 11-Jun-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 30-Mar-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 04-Jan-2021

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 24-Dec-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 05-Oct-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 07-Aug-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 04-Jun-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 06-May-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 17-Apr-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 06-Feb-2020

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 29-Nov-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 06-Sep-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 23-Jul-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 09-May-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 22-Mar-2019

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 22-Feb-2019

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  49. 04-Jan-2019

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 16-Nov-2018

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  51. 30-Aug-2018

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 26-Jun-2018

    ChargeView PDF

  53. 26-Jun-2018

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 05-May-2018

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  55. 03-Mar-2018

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 30-Dec-2017

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 24-Oct-2017

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 05-Jul-2017

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 12-Apr-2017

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 14-Feb-2017

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 27-Dec-2016

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 23-Nov-2016

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 29-Sep-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 21-Jul-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. 597/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC 597/16 This criminal case involved assault allegations where a 51-year-old male worker was brought to Aluru hospital on 23.03.2016 at 12:05 PM with multiple lacerated wounds on the chest, abdomen, and limbs (2-5 cm). Medical evidence (MLC) indicated injuries consistent with sharp weapon (knife/rod) attack. After examining witness testimony and medical evidence, the court found the evidence insufficient to establish the identity of the assailant. The case was dismissed/concluded with no further cross-examination warranted, as the prosecution failed to prove the accusations beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case