R.V. RANGASHETTY vs SHANKARASHETTY — 284/2022

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 01-Jul-2026

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS200008912022

Filing Number

284/2022

Filing Date

28-Jun-2022

Registration No

284/2022

Registration Date

28-Jun-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.R.V. RANGASHETTY

    Adv. K. NAGARAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHANKARASHETTY

Case History

  1. 01-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: A.D. No. 284/2022 Outcome: On 08.06.2026, the court recorded the DW-1 (Defendant Witness 1) examination-in-chief affidavit. The petitioner (R.V. Rangashetty) challenged a settlement agreement regarding property division, alleging fraud in how the property was partitioned and distributed. The court found the settlement valid and the case was disposed based on the agreed settlement terms from 2013-14, with property divisions confirmed as per the compromise deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 23-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 05-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 16-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 16-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 08-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 25-Nov-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 12-Nov-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 17-Sep-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 05-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 05-Aug-2025

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 09-Jan-2025

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 28-Oct-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 16-Jul-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 10-Jun-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 10-Jun-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 16-Apr-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 04-Mar-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 30-Jan-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 07-Nov-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 07-Nov-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 05-Sep-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  37. 05-Sep-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 05-Jun-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 14-Feb-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 12-Nov-2022

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 19-Oct-2022

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 10-Oct-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  43. 17-Aug-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  44. 19-Jul-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 13-Jul-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  46. 29-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 28-Jun-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  48. 28-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 284/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: A.D. No. 284/2022 Outcome: On 08.06.2026, the court recorded the DW-1 (Defendant Witness 1) examination-in-chief affidavit. The petitioner (R.V. Rangashetty) challenged a settlement agreement regarding property division, alleging fraud in how the property was partitioned and distributed. The court found the settlement valid and the case was disposed based on the agreed settlement terms from 2013-14, with property divisions confirmed as per the compromise deed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case