PALLAVI H.J vs SOMASHEKHARA R.D — 122/2022

Case under Under Section Section DV ACT 12. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 20th July 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 20-Jul-2026

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS200006552022

Filing Number

122/2022

Filing Date

05-May-2022

Registration No

122/2022

Registration Date

05-May-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Section Section DV ACT 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PALLAVI H.J

    Adv. C P UMESH

  2. 2.PREKSHITHA IS MAINER GUARDIAN HIS MOTHER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SOMASHEKHARA R.D

Case History

  1. 20-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 09-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 18-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 23-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 10-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 29-Jul-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: 122/2022 Petitioners: Pallavi H.J and Prekshitha (minor, mother as guardian) Respondent: Somashekhara R.D Date: 29.07.2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' claims, finding that the respondent abandoned the child due to marital discord and financial difficulties, not cruelty. The court determined the petitioners failed to establish grounds for relief and were not entitled to maintenance benefits sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 29-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 28-May-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 08-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 26-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 03-Aug-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 09-May-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 30-Mar-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 19-Jan-2024

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 22-Dec-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 18-Nov-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 18-Nov-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 07-Oct-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 29-Sep-2023

    Null

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 12-Sep-2023

    Null

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 19-Aug-2023

    Null

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 04-May-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 27-Apr-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 20-Jan-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 28-Oct-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 22-Jul-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 30-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 10-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 01-Jun-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 05-May-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 05-May-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 122/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 122/2022 Petitioners: Pallavi H.J and Prekshitha (minor, mother as guardian) Respondent: Somashekhara R.D Date: 29.07.2025 Outcome: Petition dismissed. The court rejected the petitioners' claims, finding that the respondent abandoned the child due to marital discord and financial difficulties, not cruelty. The court determined the petitioners failed to establish grounds for relief and were not entitled to maintenance benefits sought in the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case