H.B.ANANDA vs K.K.JALAJA Advocate - M.N.Jayaram — 245/2018

Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 27th June 2026.

Orders Next hearing 27-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAHS200005882018

Filing Number

245/2018

Filing Date

13-Apr-2018

Registration No

245/2018

Registration Date

13-Apr-2018

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.H.B.ANANDA

    Adv. K. NAGARAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.K.K.JALAJA Advocate - M.N.Jayaram

  2. 2.K.M.KRISHNEGOWDA

Case History

  1. 27-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 20-Jan-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 13-Oct-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 24-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 15-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 04-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 07-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 04-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 24-Feb-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 29-Jan-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 22-Nov-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 25-Sep-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 26-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 24-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 18-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 10-Jan-2024

    Null.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 05-Dec-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 27-Sep-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 16-Aug-2023

    DepositionView PDF

    In O.S. No. 245/2018 (dated 16-08-2023), the court dismissed the petition. The court found that the petitioner's claims under Sections 42, 44, 36/1, and 19 lacked merit, and the evidence and documents presented were insufficient to support the case. No appeal was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  27. 16-Aug-2023

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 04-Jul-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 04-Jul-2023

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 04-Jul-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 20-Jun-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 12-Jun-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 03-Jun-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 20-Feb-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 24-Jan-2023

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 23-Nov-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 25-Oct-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 12-Sep-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  40. 12-Sep-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  41. 12-Sep-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  42. 23-Aug-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  43. 23-Aug-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  44. 23-Aug-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  45. 17-Aug-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  46. 17-Aug-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  47. 01-Aug-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  48. 11-Jul-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  49. 11-Jul-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  50. 05-Jul-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  51. 05-Jul-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  52. 02-Jul-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  53. 13-Jun-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  54. 29-Mar-2022

    DepositionView PDF

  55. 29-Mar-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  56. 18-Jan-2022

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  57. 09-Nov-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  58. 22-Sep-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  59. 28-Jul-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  60. 10-Jun-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  61. 19-Feb-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  62. 19-Jan-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  63. 08-Jan-2021

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  64. 21-Nov-2020

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  65. 04-Sep-2020

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  66. 22-Jun-2020

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  67. 18-May-2020

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  68. 20-Feb-2020

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  69. 25-Nov-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  70. 26-Aug-2019

    DepositionView PDF

  71. 26-Aug-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  72. 23-Jul-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  73. 06-Jun-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  74. 03-Apr-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  75. 23-Jan-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  76. 22-Jan-2019

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  77. 15-Nov-2018

    IssueView PDF

  78. 15-Nov-2018

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  79. 03-Oct-2018

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  80. 18-Sep-2018

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  81. 06-Aug-2018

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  82. 12-Jul-2018

    Evidence.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  83. 30-Jun-2018

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  84. 30-May-2018

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  85. 13-Apr-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  86. 13-Apr-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 245/2018

casestatus.in Summary

In O.S. No. 245/2018 (dated 16-08-2023), the court dismissed the petition. The court found that the petitioner's claims under Sections 42, 44, 36/1, and 19 lacked merit, and the evidence and documents presented were insufficient to support the case. No appeal was permitted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case