M S NAGARAJA vs BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR, ALUR. — 116/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS200004222026

Filing Number

116/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

116/2026

Registration Date

06-Apr-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M S NAGARAJA

    Adv. B R MOHAN KUMAR

  2. 2.BHAGYA

  3. 3.VENKATESHA

  4. 4.KRISHNAIAH M S

  5. 5.MALLIGAMMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BIRTH AND DEATH REGISTRAR, ALUR.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Summary of Case 116/2026 The Civil Court at Alur (Judicial Magistrate's Court) allowed the petition filed by M.S. Nagaraja, Bhagya, and Venkatesha seeking registration of the death of one Shivayya (deceased on 24.06.2024) with the Birth and Death Registrar, Alur. The court found that the deceased's death date was never registered in the official records despite petitioner's repeated requests, and accepted the testimony establishing the death occurred on the specified date. The court accordingly directed the registrar to register the death and collect applicable fees from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 116/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 116/2026 The Civil Court at Alur (Judicial Magistrate's Court) allowed the petition filed by M.S. Nagaraja, Bhagya, and Venkatesha seeking registration of the death of one Shivayya (deceased on 24.06.2024) with the Birth and Death Registrar, Alur. The court found that the deceased's death date was never registered in the official records despite petitioner's repeated requests, and accepted the testimony establishing the death occurred on the specified date. The court accordingly directed the registrar to register the death and collect applicable fees from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case