MAGANNA vs TAHASILDAR, ALUR. — 114/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS200004202026
Filing Number
114/2026
Filing Date
06-Apr-2026
Registration No
114/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR
Judge
348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
17-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MAGANNA
Adv. M.M.SUNIL
-
2.ERESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.TAHASILDAR, ALUR.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Jun-2026
Orders
SUMMARY The court allowed the petitioners' application under Section 13(3) of the Succession Act, 1969. The petitioners sought a directive order to register their mother Parvathamma's (deceased on 05.01.1980) land in the revenue records of Aluru Taluk. The Tahasildar had not registered the property in the revenue register despite requests. Finding the petitioners' evidence credible and their claims substantiated, the court ordered the Tahasildar to register the deceased's land date of death in the revenue records and collect applicable fees from the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-May-2026
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 114/2026
SUMMARY The court allowed the petitioners' application under Section 13(3) of the Succession Act, 1969. The petitioners sought a directive order to register their mother Parvathamma's (deceased on 05.01.1980) land in the revenue records of Aluru Taluk. The Tahasildar had not registered the property in the revenue register despite requests. Finding the petitioners' evidence credible and their claims substantiated, the court ordered the Tahasildar to register the deceased's land date of death in the revenue records and collect applicable fees from the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts