MAHADEVAIAH vs REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, TALUK OFFICE, ALUR — 101/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS200003712026

Filing Number

101/2026

Filing Date

12-Mar-2026

Registration No

101/2026

Registration Date

12-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ALUR

Judge

348-CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHADEVAIAH

    Adv. K.G.NAGARAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, TALUK OFFICE, ALUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Case Summary: MAHADEVAIAH v. REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, TALUK OFFICE, ALUR (Case 101/2026) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application and directed the respondent to register the death of one Devaiyya (dated 08.10.1967) in the birth and death register of Aluru taluk, with the petitioner bearing associated registration fees. The petitioner's testimony establishing the death date was accepted as credible and sufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 26-May-2026

    Deposition

  5. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 12-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MAHADEVAIAH v. REGISTRAR, BIRTH AND DEATH, TALUK OFFICE, ALUR (Case 101/2026) Decision: The court granted the petitioner's application and directed the respondent to register the death of one Devaiyya (dated 08.10.1967) in the birth and death register of Aluru taluk, with the petitioner bearing associated registration fees. The petitioner's testimony establishing the death date was accepted as credible and sufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case