M/S SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L. vs YASHODAMMA — 400/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,AND,32. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.EX. - COMMERCIAL SUIT

CNR: KAHS010083082025

Filing Number

681/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

400/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,AND,32
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section U/S,13(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SHRI RAM FINANCE LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L.

    Adv. SANTHOSH B.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.YASHODAMMA

  2. 2.RAMESH H.D

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case 400/2026 Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by Shri Ram Finance Ltd. against respondents Yashodamma and Ramesh H.D. on 18.03.2026. The court found that proper steps had not been taken, the defendant showed no interest in the petition, and no grounds existed to grant further time extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 400/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 400/2026 Summary: The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by Shri Ram Finance Ltd. against respondents Yashodamma and Ramesh H.D. on 18.03.2026. The court found that proper steps had not been taken, the defendant showed no interest in the petition, and no grounds existed to grant further time extension. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case