M/S. SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L. vs KIRAN Y.J. — 366/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,AND,32. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

Com.EX. - COMMERCIAL SUIT

CNR: KAHS010077972025

Filing Number

622/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

366/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,AND,32
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section U/S,13(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SHRIRAM FINANCE LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L.

    Adv. SANTHOSH B.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KIRAN Y.J.

  2. 2.AHAMAD SHARIF

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. on 23.03.2026, finding that proper procedural steps were not taken and the defendant (D.Hr) showed no interest in the proceedings. No grounds existed to grant further time extension, resulting in outright dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 366/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by Shriram Finance Ltd. on 23.03.2026, finding that proper procedural steps were not taken and the defendant (D.Hr) showed no interest in the proceedings. No grounds existed to grant further time extension, resulting in outright dismissal of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case