CANARA BANK, HASSAN, BRANCH, REP. BY MANAGER, VAIBHAV GULABROA SONONE vs GOPALAGOWDA — 192/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

Com.EX. - COMMERCIAL SUIT

CNR: KAHS010076482025

e-Filing Number

07-11-2025

Filing Number

560/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

192/2025

Registration Date

15-Nov-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section U/S,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CANARA BANK, HASSAN, BRANCH, REP. BY MANAGER, VAIBHAV GULABROA SONONE

    Adv. NARAYANA MURTHY S K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPALAGOWDA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The petition filed by Canara Bank, Hassan Branch against Gopalagowda was dismissed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan on 27.03.2026. The court found no grounds for the petition as the dharaholder and advocate were absent without representation, no further steps had been taken despite the case being over six months old, thus warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 09-Feb-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 13-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 18-Dec-2025

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 18-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 192/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The petition filed by Canara Bank, Hassan Branch against Gopalagowda was dismissed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan on 27.03.2026. The court found no grounds for the petition as the dharaholder and advocate were absent without representation, no further steps had been taken despite the case being over six months old, thus warranting dismissal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case