GIDDAMMA vs SPECIAL LAO, HRP, HASSAN — 545/2025

Case under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section U/S 64(1). Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

L.A.C. - Land Acquisition Cases

CNR: KAHS010060212025

Filing Number

547/2025

Filing Date

06-Sep-2025

Registration No

545/2025

Registration Date

08-Sep-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

336-Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act Section U/S 64(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GIDDAMMA

    Adv. LOHITH.K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SPECIAL LAO, HRP, HASSAN

  2. 2.CHIEF ENGINEER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: LAC 545/2025 (Giddamma v. Special LAO, HRP, Hassan and Chief Engineer) The First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan, abated the case on 05.06.2026 because the petitioner's Legal Representatives (LR's) failed to produce essential documents—a death certificate and a G-Tree (genealogical tree). The court dismissed the petition due to lack of requisite documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Jan-2026

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    First Hearing

    Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 545/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: LAC 545/2025 (Giddamma v. Special LAO, HRP, Hassan and Chief Engineer) The First Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan, abated the case on 05.06.2026 because the petitioner's Legal Representatives (LR's) failed to produce essential documents—a death certificate and a G-Tree (genealogical tree). The court dismissed the petition due to lack of requisite documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case