VENKATESHA vs SHIVA KUMAR K.B. — 1489/2025

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S,166. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 11th July 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases

CNR: KAHS010059942025

Filing Number

1489/2025

Filing Date

06-Sep-2025

Registration No

1489/2025

Registration Date

12-Sep-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

1162-III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-Jul-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section U/S,166

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VENKATESHA

    Adv. THULASI RAM K.J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHIVA KUMAR K.B.

  2. 2.THE MANAGER, IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jul-2026

    Orders

    In Case 1489/2025, the Lok Adalat accepted a joint settlement between petitioner Venkatesha and respondent IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., wherein the insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 1,25,000 as full and final compensation for an accident-related claim. The court found the settlement voluntary, lawful, and fair, and disposed of the petition in terms of the agreed settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2026

    Disposed

    III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 26-May-2026

    Notice

    III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Summons

    III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 13-Jan-2026

    Summons

    III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Notice

    III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 16-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1489/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 1489/2025, the Lok Adalat accepted a joint settlement between petitioner Venkatesha and respondent IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd., wherein the insurance company agreed to pay Rs. 1,25,000 as full and final compensation for an accident-related claim. The court found the settlement voluntary, lawful, and fair, and disposed of the petition in terms of the agreed settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case