SHREE KIRAN. V. N vs NC DIAGNOSTICS PARTNERSHIP FIRM (REP. BY ITS PARTNER Dr. NAGARAJ ) — 1/2023

Case under Industrial Disputes Act Section U/S,33(C)(2),OF,INDUSTRIAL,DISPUTE,ACT. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th April 2026.

Case disposed

APPL.33(C)(2)

CNR: KAHS010059802023

Filing Number

1/2023

Filing Date

26-Oct-2023

Registration No

1/2023

Registration Date

27-Oct-2023

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act Section U/S,33(C)(2),OF,INDUSTRIAL,DISPUTE,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHREE KIRAN. V. N

    Adv. J.P.LUKMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NC DIAGNOSTICS PARTNERSHIP FIRM (REP. BY ITS PARTNER Dr. NAGARAJ )

  2. 2.CHANDRU S.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: Shree Kiran V.N v. NC Diagnostics Partnership Firm The court allowed the applicant's petition to withdraw his original application seeking recovery of incentives, leave wages, and bonus, with liberty to file a fresh application. The court found a formal procedural defect: the applicant failed to approach the appropriate labor authority for conciliation proceedings before filing under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, which is a mandatory prerequisite. However, since this defect cannot be cured by amendment, withdrawal with liberty to refile was permitted subject to statutory limitations. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 payable to the respondent, as the applicant's premature filing compelled the respondent to defend the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    Orders.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 25-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 17-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 03-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 19-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 03-Jan-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 11-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 28-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 17-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 11-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 19-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  22. 19-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 30-Aug-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  25. 30-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 04-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 16-Jul-2025

    Orders.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 03-Jul-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 19-Jun-2025

    Arguments

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 29-Apr-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 04-Apr-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 25-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 04-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  35. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 18-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  38. 22-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  40. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  41. 11-Nov-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  42. 11-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  43. 21-Sep-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  44. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  45. 20-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  46. 20-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  47. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  48. 29-May-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  49. 08-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  50. 11-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  51. 05-Feb-2024

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  52. 05-Jan-2024

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  53. 05-Dec-2023

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  54. 31-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 26-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shree Kiran V.N v. NC Diagnostics Partnership Firm The court allowed the applicant's petition to withdraw his original application seeking recovery of incentives, leave wages, and bonus, with liberty to file a fresh application. The court found a formal procedural defect: the applicant failed to approach the appropriate labor authority for conciliation proceedings before filing under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Dispute Act, which is a mandatory prerequisite. However, since this defect cannot be cured by amendment, withdrawal with liberty to refile was permitted subject to statutory limitations. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 payable to the respondent, as the applicant's premature filing compelled the respondent to defend the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case