VEENA vs SANTHOSH KUMAR.H.R Advocate - K.C. KESHAVA MURTHY — 197/2023

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section U/S29. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAHS010052762023

Filing Number

197/2023

Filing Date

20-Sep-2023

Registration No

197/2023

Registration Date

20-Sep-2023

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section U/S29

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VEENA

    Adv. C.A.WILSON

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANTHOSH KUMAR.H.R Advocate - K.C. KESHAVA MURTHY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The court set aside the trial court's domestic violence order and rejected the wife's maintenance claims. The Principal District & Sessions Judge found that the wife (Veena) failed to prove domestic violence against her husband (Santhosh Kumar H.R.) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Key issues included: the petition was filed without a mandatory domestic incident report; the wife provided insufficient evidence of harassment, dowry demands, or economic abuse; and she was found to be gainfully employed (as an engineer), thus capable of self-maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 28-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 09-Feb-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 28-Jan-2026

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 18-Dec-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 05-Dec-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 06-Nov-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 27-Sep-2025

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 22-Jul-2025

    A.D.R

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Jun-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 07-May-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 07-Apr-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 24-Feb-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Jan-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 10-Jan-2025

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 16-Dec-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 28-Nov-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 29-Oct-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 12-Sep-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 05-Jul-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 07-Jun-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 24-May-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 20-May-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 15-May-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 24-Apr-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 16-Apr-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 13-Mar-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 21-Feb-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 07-Feb-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  35. 03-Feb-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 20-Jan-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 08-Jan-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  38. 02-Dec-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 18-Nov-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  40. 30-Oct-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  41. 21-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 20-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 197/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court set aside the trial court's domestic violence order and rejected the wife's maintenance claims. The Principal District & Sessions Judge found that the wife (Veena) failed to prove domestic violence against her husband (Santhosh Kumar H.R.) under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Key issues included: the petition was filed without a mandatory domestic incident report; the wife provided insufficient evidence of harassment, dowry demands, or economic abuse; and she was found to be gainfully employed (as an engineer), thus capable of self-maintenance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case