HOLENARSIPURA RURAL PS vs KESHAVAMURTHY J G Advocate - RAJU. H.J — 234/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code. Status: Evidence.. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Evidence. Next hearing 16-Jul-2026

SC - SESSION CASES

CNR: KAHS010050752022

Filing Number

234/2022

Filing Date

16-Sep-2022

Registration No

234/2022

Registration Date

16-Sep-2022

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0161

Police Station

HOLENARASIPURA RURAL PS

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HOLENARSIPURA RURAL PS (Police Station)

    Adv. PP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KESHAVAMURTHY J G Advocate - RAJU. H.J

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  3. 12-May-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary of SC Case 234/2022 This is a criminal case from the Principal District and Sessions Court in Hassan involving witness testimony (PW-1) in a dispute between Holenarsipura Rural Police Station and advocate Keshavamurthy. The witness testified about a violent altercation over a land dispute dating back approximately 10 years. According to the testimony, accused individuals Keshavamurthy and others attacked the witness's father-in-law with weapons (sticks, powder, and knives), causing injuries that required hospitalization and treatment at multiple facilities, including a Bangalore medical facility. The witness identified the accused and the weapons used (marked as M.O. 1-3). The accused's counsel requested time but was not found present, resulting in the case proceeding without cross-examination. The case status remains documented as a witness examination record with no final judgment outcome specified in this particular court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 18-Mar-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Feb-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  10. 29-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  11. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  12. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  13. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  14. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  15. 23-Jul-2025

    Call For Property

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  17. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  18. 28-Mar-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  19. 21-Feb-2025

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  20. 09-Dec-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  21. 20-Nov-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  22. 09-Sep-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  23. 12-Jul-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  24. 17-May-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  25. 28-Mar-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  26. 14-Mar-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  27. 15-Feb-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  28. 24-Jan-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  29. 03-Jan-2024

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  30. 12-Dec-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  31. 27-Nov-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  32. 15-Nov-2023

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  33. 07-Nov-2023

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  34. 31-Oct-2023

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  35. 17-Oct-2023

    Orders

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  36. 26-Sep-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  37. 29-Aug-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  38. 25-Jul-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  39. 01-Jul-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  40. 17-Jun-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  41. 20-May-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  42. 26-Apr-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  43. 05-Apr-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  44. 03-Apr-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  45. 28-Mar-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  46. 14-Mar-2023

    Arguments.

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  47. 20-Dec-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  48. 28-Nov-2022

    Call On

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  49. 18-Oct-2022

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  50. 20-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 16-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of SC Case 234/2022 This is a criminal case from the Principal District and Sessions Court in Hassan involving witness testimony (PW-1) in a dispute between Holenarsipura Rural Police Station and advocate Keshavamurthy. The witness testified about a violent altercation over a land dispute dating back approximately 10 years. According to the testimony, accused individuals Keshavamurthy and others attacked the witness's father-in-law with weapons (sticks, powder, and knives), causing injuries that required hospitalization and treatment at multiple facilities, including a Bangalore medical facility. The witness identified the accused and the weapons used (marked as M.O. 1-3). The accused's counsel requested time but was not found present, resulting in the case proceeding without cross-examination. The case status remains documented as a witness examination record with no final judgment outcome specified in this particular court order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case