SANTHOSHKUMAR.H.R vs VEENA Advocate - C.A.WILSON — 162/2023
Case under U/s 29 of D.v.act. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.
CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: KAHS010043762023
Filing Number
162/2023
Filing Date
10-Aug-2023
Registration No
162/2023
Registration Date
10-Aug-2023
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN
Judge
335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 20-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SANTHOSHKUMAR.H.R
Adv. H.P.PARAMESHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.VEENA Advocate - C.A.WILSON
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan, set aside the trial court's order that had partly allowed a wife's domestic violence petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005. The judge found that the wife failed to prove domestic violence against her husband and was not entitled to monetary relief. The court noted the petition was filed without the mandatory domestic incident report required under the PWDVA rules, and the wife—a BE graduate working in Bengaluru—had sufficient means of self-maintenance, eliminating entitlement to support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2026
Judgement
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgement
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Mar-2026
Judgement
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Judgement
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Dec-2025
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Nov-2025
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Sep-2025
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
A.D.R
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
23-Jun-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-May-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Apr-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Feb-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Jan-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
10-Jan-2025
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Dec-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
28-Nov-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-Oct-2024
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Sep-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jul-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Jun-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-May-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-May-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
24-Apr-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
16-Apr-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
13-Mar-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
21-Feb-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
07-Feb-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
03-Feb-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Jan-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
12-Jan-2024
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
27-Dec-2023
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Dec-2023
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-Nov-2023
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
30-Oct-2023
Arguments.
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Oct-2023
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
15-Sep-2023
First Hearing
Prl. District And Sessions Judge
-
11-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 162/2023
Summary The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan, set aside the trial court's order that had partly allowed a wife's domestic violence petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (PWDVA), 2005. The judge found that the wife failed to prove domestic violence against her husband and was not entitled to monetary relief. The court noted the petition was filed without the mandatory domestic incident report required under the PWDVA rules, and the wife—a BE graduate working in Bengaluru—had sufficient means of self-maintenance, eliminating entitlement to support. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts