VARUN GOWDA H.S. SON OF LATE SWAMY vs HASSAN EXTENSION PS — 559/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES

CNR: KAHS010039452026

Filing Number

559/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

559/2026

Registration Date

25-May-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

1162-III Addl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 17-Jul-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0140

Police Station

HASSAN EXTENSION PS

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,483

Petitioner(s)

1.VARUN GOWDA H.S. SON OF LATE SWAMY

Adv. H.S MOHAN R GOWDA

Respondent(s)

1.HASSAN EXTENSION PS (Police Station)

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
10-Jun-2026

Orders

Summary: The court granted regular bail to Varun Gowda H.S., accused of assaulting a gym member on May 12, 2026, causing him to lose consciousness. Though charged under Sections 109 and 352 of the Bharathiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the court found the injuries were not serious (victim discharged same day), investigation was substantially complete, and the accused had no criminal history, warranting bail with conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond, bifortnightly police attendance, and restrictions against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
10-Jun-2026

Disposed

III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
04-Jun-2026

Orders.

III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
30-May-2026

First Hearing

III Addl. District And Sessions Judge
26-May-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
25-May-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 559/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court granted regular bail to Varun Gowda H.S., accused of assaulting a gym member on May 12, 2026, causing him to lose consciousness. Though charged under Sections 109 and 352 of the Bharathiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023, the court found the injuries were not serious (victim discharged same day), investigation was substantially complete, and the accused had no criminal history, warranting bail with conditions including a ₹1,00,000 bond, bifortnightly police attendance, and restrictions against witness tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.