B.V.GANESHA SON OF VIRUPAKSHAPPA vs BELUR PS — 554/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS010039352026
Filing Number
554/2026
Filing Date
25-May-2026
Registration No
554/2026
Registration Date
25-May-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN
Judge
975-II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
12-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0132
Police Station
BELUR PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.B.V.GANESHA SON OF VIRUPAKSHAPPA
Adv. B V NATARAJA
Respondent(s)
-
1.BELUR PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Jun-2026
Orders
Summary of Case 554/2026 The court granted bail to B.V. Ganesha, accused of assaulting his parents with a dangerous weapon and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 352, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), and 109. The judge found that no grievous injuries were sustained, no hospital records existed, and the case appeared to be a family dispute; consequently, stringent bail conditions (including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond, monthly police check-ins, and witness non-interference) adequately addressed prosecution concerns about flight risk and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jun-2026
Disposed
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
09-Jun-2026
Orders.
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2026
Arguments
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
02-Jun-2026
First Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
30-May-2026
First Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 554/2026
Summary of Case 554/2026 The court granted bail to B.V. Ganesha, accused of assaulting his parents with a dangerous weapon and criminal intimidation under BNS sections 352, 115(2), 118(1), 351(2), and 109. The judge found that no grievous injuries were sustained, no hospital records existed, and the case appeared to be a family dispute; consequently, stringent bail conditions (including a Rs. 1,00,000 bond, monthly police check-ins, and witness non-interference) adequately addressed prosecution concerns about flight risk and evidence tampering. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts