JYOTHI DAUGHTER OF KRISHNAPPA vs PENSION MOHALLA PS — 524/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 10th June 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAHS010038642026
Filing Number
524/2026
Filing Date
19-May-2026
Registration No
524/2026
Registration Date
19-May-2026
Court
PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN
Judge
975-II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 17-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0071
Police Station
PENSION MOHALLA PS
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JYOTHI DAUGHTER OF KRISHNAPPA
Adv. PAVANKUMAR C.S
Respondent(s)
-
1.PENSION MOHALLA PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Orders
Summary of Case 524/2026 The Court of II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hassan rejected Jyothi's bail petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. The court found that Jyothi and co-accused committed robbery, extorting ₹6,500 and gold rings worth ₹3,00,000 from the complainant, and recorded threatening videos. Given the serious nature of the non-bailable offences, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering and absconding, and recovery of incriminating evidence from her possession, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Disposed
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
06-Jun-2026
Orders
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
05-Jun-2026
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
04-Jun-2026
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
29-May-2026
Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
26-May-2026
First Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
22-May-2026
First Hearing
II Addl. District And Sessions Judge
-
20-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 524/2026
Summary of Case 524/2026 The Court of II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Hassan rejected Jyothi's bail petition under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. The court found that Jyothi and co-accused committed robbery, extorting ₹6,500 and gold rings worth ₹3,00,000 from the complainant, and recorded threatening videos. Given the serious nature of the non-bailable offences, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering and absconding, and recovery of incriminating evidence from her possession, the court denied bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts