M/S. SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD, REP, BY KESHAVAMURTHY S.L. vs RAVI KUMARA — 328/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,OF,CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX - Execution Petition Under Order

CNR: KAHS010030832025

Filing Number

188/2025

Filing Date

02-May-2025

Registration No

328/2025

Registration Date

03-Dec-2025

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O,21,RULE,11,OF,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SHRI RAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD, REP, BY KESHAVAMURTHY S.L.

    Adv. PADMA H.M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAVI KUMARA

  2. 2.CHANDHRASHEKARA G. T.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by M/S. Shri Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. on 18.03.2026, finding that proper procedural steps were not taken and the respondent (D.Hr) showed no interest in the matter. The court found no grounds to grant further time and rejected the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 22-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 02-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 328/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Principal District & Sessions Judge, Hassan dismissed the petition filed by M/S. Shri Ram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. on 18.03.2026, finding that proper procedural steps were not taken and the respondent (D.Hr) showed no interest in the matter. The court found no grounds to grant further time and rejected the petition accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case