M/S. SHRI RAM FINANCE CO. LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L. vs VENKATESHA B.E. — 224/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 RULE 11. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE on 28th April 2026.

Case disposed

Com.EX. - COMMERCIAL SUIT

CNR: KAHS010007732026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

29-Jan-2026

Registration No

224/2026

Registration Date

30-Jan-2026

Court

PRL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, HASSAN

Judge

335-Prl. District And Sessions Judge

Decision Date

28-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED / REJECTED OTHERWISE

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O 21 RULE 11
The Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section U/S 3(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. SHRI RAM FINANCE CO. LTD., REP. BY GPA HOLDER KESHAVA MURTHY S.L.

    Adv. SHASHIKALA H K

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VENKATESHA B.E.

  2. 2.MANJUSHETTY B.P

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 28-Apr-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition filed by Shri Ram Finance Co. Ltd. after the defendant's counsel failed to serve the citation on the respondents for two consecutive hearing dates and did not furnish the required court affidavit. The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Hassan found no grounds to grant further time and concluded the defendant lacked interest in pursuing the petition, dismissing it on 28.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Notice

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    First Hearing

    Prl. District And Sessions Judge

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 224/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition filed by Shri Ram Finance Co. Ltd. after the defendant's counsel failed to serve the citation on the respondents for two consecutive hearing dates and did not furnish the required court affidavit. The Principal District & Sessions Judge of Hassan found no grounds to grant further time and concluded the defendant lacked interest in pursuing the petition, dismissing it on 28.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case