THE BANK OF BARODA, ITS REP M.GOPI, S/O MUNIRAJ, MANAGER vs SHARANAPPA BASAVANTAPPA KULKARNI — 335/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O VII,RULE,1 AND 2. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADW500024842025
Filing Number
335/2025
Filing Date
24-Oct-2025
Registration No
335/2025
Registration Date
24-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAVALGUND
Judge
304-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE BANK OF BARODA, ITS REP M.GOPI, S/O MUNIRAJ, MANAGER
Adv. R M Ramajeni
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHARANAPPA BASAVANTAPPA KULKARNI
-
2.BALAPPA YALLAPPA HALAVAR
Case History
-
03-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
11-Jun-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
23-Apr-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
18-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. 335/2025 Bank of Baroda's witness (PW-1) testified on 18-03-2026, submitting an affidavit and identifying nine exhibits including loan application forms, hypothecation and mortgage agreements, guarantee agreement, legal notice, and NPA statement. The defendants were absent with no representation; consequently, cross-examination of PW-1 was marked as nil. The court record shows the case was at the witness examination stage with Bank of Baroda praying for decree of the suit, but no final order/judgment is recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Mar-2026
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
07-Feb-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
28-Nov-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
24-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 335/2025
Case Summary: O.S. 335/2025 Bank of Baroda's witness (PW-1) testified on 18-03-2026, submitting an affidavit and identifying nine exhibits including loan application forms, hypothecation and mortgage agreements, guarantee agreement, legal notice, and NPA statement. The defendants were absent with no representation; consequently, cross-examination of PW-1 was marked as nil. The court record shows the case was at the witness examination stage with Bank of Baroda praying for decree of the suit, but no final order/judgment is recorded in this document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts