THE BANK OF BARODA,ITS REP. M.GOIPI S/O MUNIRAJ,Sn.BRANCH MANAGER vs BASAPPA KARIYAPPA MADIWALAR — 330/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/O, VII,RULE,1 AND 2. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR on 02nd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADW500024772025
Filing Number
330/2025
Filing Date
18-Oct-2025
Registration No
330/2025
Registration Date
18-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAVALGUND
Judge
304-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
Decision Date
02-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED BY ADR
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE BANK OF BARODA,ITS REP. M.GOIPI S/O MUNIRAJ,Sn.BRANCH MANAGER
Adv. R M Ramajeni
Respondent(s)
-
1.BASAPPA KARIYAPPA MADIWALAR
-
2.YOGAPPA NAGAPPA MADIWALAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Bank of Baroda's suit claim of Rs. 3,31,246 against defendants Basappa Kariyappa Madiwalar and Yogappa Nagappa Madiwalar was disposed of as compromised after the defendants paid the full amount as One-Time Settlement (OTS) during conciliation proceedings. The court accepted the settlement memo and directed refund of all court fees paid by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Apr-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
01-Apr-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
18-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
09-Feb-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
22-Jan-2026
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
09-Dec-2025
Written Statement
CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
-
23-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 330/2025
The Bank of Baroda's suit claim of Rs. 3,31,246 against defendants Basappa Kariyappa Madiwalar and Yogappa Nagappa Madiwalar was disposed of as compromised after the defendants paid the full amount as One-Time Settlement (OTS) during conciliation proceedings. The court accepted the settlement memo and directed refund of all court fees paid by the bank. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts