NINGARADDI S/O TAMMARADDI KARAMALLI vs PRATIK S/O RAMAHANDRARAO PUJAR — 2/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,138 OF NI ACT. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERD AS CC on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

PCR - PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTER

CNR: KADW500000102026

Filing Number

2/2026

Filing Date

05-Jan-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

05-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, NAVALGUND

Judge

304-CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERD AS CC

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section U/S,138 OF NI ACT

Petitioner(s)

1.NINGARADDI S/O TAMMARADDI KARAMALLI

Adv. M S Hebballi

Respondent(s)

1.PRATIK S/O RAMAHANDRARAO PUJAR

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
29-Apr-2026

Orders

The court took cognizance of a cheque dishonour complaint filed by Ningaraddi against Pratik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Finding that all statutory requirements were satisfied—including timely legal notice (issued 06.11.2025, served 08.11.2025) and non-payment within 15 days—the court found a prima facie case and registered the case for prosecution, ordering it placed on the board for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
29-Apr-2026

Disposed

CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
18-Mar-2026

Enquiry

CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
18-Feb-2026

Notice

CIVIL Judge And JMFC, Navalgund
06-Jan-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
05-Jan-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance of a cheque dishonour complaint filed by Ningaraddi against Pratik under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Finding that all statutory requirements were satisfied—including timely legal notice (issued 06.11.2025, served 08.11.2025) and non-payment within 15 days—the court found a prima facie case and registered the case for prosecution, ordering it placed on the board for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.