Peerpasha S/o Mehaboobsab Peer Draga @ Peerjade vs Tajuddinpeer S/o Modinsab Peerjade@ Darga — 1/2024
Case under Order 41 Rule 5 Cpc Section 151 CPC. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th June 2026.
Ex.A. - Execution Appeals
CNR: KADW410016272024
Filing Number
1/2024
Filing Date
03-Dec-2024
Registration No
1/2024
Registration Date
03-Dec-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDGOL
Judge
1220-Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Decision Date
06-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Peerpasha S/o Mehaboobsab Peer Draga @ Peerjade
Adv. Ramkrishna Hegde
Respondent(s)
-
1.Tajuddinpeer S/o Modinsab Peerjade@ Darga
-
2.Ismailsab S/o WalipashaDarga @ Peerjade
-
3.Yusufpeer S/o WalipashaDarga @ Peerjade(Legal Heir)
-
4.Abbasali S/o WalipashaDarga @ Peerjade
-
5.Ahmedpeer S/o WalipashaDarga @ Peerjade
-
6.Smt Bibijan W/o Dadapeer @ KaliminipeeraPeerjade
-
7.Smt Thahirbegum W/o JaveInamdar
-
8.Mehaboobsab S/o ModinsabDarga @ Peerjade
-
9.Smt Mamataj W/o Babajan @ Babasaheb Darga @ Peerjade
-
10.Smt Riyanabegum W/o Kalandarsab Mulla
-
11.Modinsab S/o Babajan @ Babasaheb Darga @ Peerjade
-
12.Smt Shammubegum D/o Babajan @ Babasaheb Darga @ Peerjade
-
13.Smt Kaishmabegum D/o Babajan @ Babasaheb Darga @ Peerjade
-
14.Smt Rajiyabegum W/o Abdulhamid @ Syed Abdulrahaman @ Peerjade
-
15.Shabanbegum W/o Bandenawaj Darga urf Peerjade
-
16.Smt Reshmabanu W/o Ashpak Havaragi
-
17.Ashamabanu D/o Bandenawaj Darga urf Peerjade
-
18.Ashapakahamad S/o Bandenavaj Darga urf Peerjade
-
19.Arif S/o Bandenavaj Darga urf Peerjade
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-Jun-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: Ex.A No.1/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Peerpasha challenging the trial court's rejection of his objection to the execution petition. The court upheld the lower court's order and imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 against the appellant. Key Reasoning: The court found that Peerpasha's claim to a 1/5th share based on an alleged will executed by deceased Dadapeer was previously contested and rejected in the original partition suit (O.S. No.34/2002). Dadapeer's alleged will beneficiaries were never made parties to that suit, and the defendant who raised the will claim failed to produce evidence. The court confirmed that properties allotted to the decree holder under the partition decree cannot be obstructed by claims not properly established in the original proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Jun-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Apr-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Mar-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Feb-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jan-2026
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2025
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Oct-2025
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Oct-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Jul-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jul-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-May-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Mar-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
Objections
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Jan-2025
Notice
Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 1/2024
Case Summary: Ex.A No.1/2024 Court Decision: The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by Peerpasha challenging the trial court's rejection of his objection to the execution petition. The court upheld the lower court's order and imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 against the appellant. Key Reasoning: The court found that Peerpasha's claim to a 1/5th share based on an alleged will executed by deceased Dadapeer was previously contested and rejected in the original partition suit (O.S. No.34/2002). Dadapeer's alleged will beneficiaries were never made parties to that suit, and the defendant who raised the will claim failed to produce evidence. The court confirmed that properties allotted to the decree holder under the partition decree cannot be obstructed by claims not properly established in the original proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts