Smt. Sangeeta C/o Gurusiddappa Puttappanavar vs Sri. Gurusiddappa S/o Gurupadappa Puttappanavar Advocate - C M Kale — 46/2024
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 125. Status: Balance payment. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KADW400003962024
Filing Number
46/2024
Filing Date
06-Aug-2024
Registration No
46/2024
Registration Date
06-Aug-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDGOL
Judge
302-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Smt. Sangeeta C/o Gurusiddappa Puttappanavar
Adv. B.P.Patil
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sri. Gurusiddappa S/o Gurupadappa Puttappanavar Advocate - C M Kale
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Balance payment
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
19-May-2026
Balance payment
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
23-Apr-2026
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
18-Mar-2026
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
26-Feb-2026
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
04-Feb-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary of Case 46/2024 This is a matrimonial dispute from the Civil and Criminal Court in Kundgol (Karnataka). Smt. Sangeeta testified on February 4, 2026, regarding her marriage to Sri. Gurusiddappa. Her testimony detailed allegations about dowry demands (10 gold bangles, ₹1 lakh, and ₹10,000 in cash), inappropriate treatment during the engagement period, and claims that she was forced to leave her husband's house after six months of marriage due to alleged cruelty and mental harassment. The court recorded her detailed account of family disputes, accusations against her in-laws, and her subsequent treatment for psychological distress, with the proceeding adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel further opportunity to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2026
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
08-Jan-2026
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
23-Dec-2025
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
27-Nov-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
27-Nov-2025
Cross Of P.W.
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
05-Nov-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
04-Sep-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
28-Aug-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
28-Aug-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
07-Aug-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
04-Jul-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
04-Jun-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
01-Apr-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
01-Apr-2025
Enquiry
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
18-Mar-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
06-Mar-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
03-Mar-2025
Compliance of Order
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
18-Feb-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
05-Feb-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
16-Jan-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
12-Dec-2024
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
03-Dec-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
27-Nov-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
25-Nov-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
22-Nov-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
24-Oct-2024
Await Report/Order/Summons/Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
27-Sep-2024
Await Report/Order/Summons/Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
02-Sep-2024
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
08-Aug-2024
OrdersView PDF
-
08-Aug-2024
Notice
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol
-
06-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 46/2024
Summary of Case 46/2024 This is a matrimonial dispute from the Civil and Criminal Court in Kundgol (Karnataka). Smt. Sangeeta testified on February 4, 2026, regarding her marriage to Sri. Gurusiddappa. Her testimony detailed allegations about dowry demands (10 gold bangles, ₹1 lakh, and ₹10,000 in cash), inappropriate treatment during the engagement period, and claims that she was forced to leave her husband's house after six months of marriage due to alleged cruelty and mental harassment. The court recorded her detailed account of family disputes, accusations against her in-laws, and her subsequent treatment for psychological distress, with the proceeding adjourned to allow the respondent's counsel further opportunity to cross-examine the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts