GUDAGERI PS vs ABDULREHAMAN BABAJAN MULLA Advocate - G B Soratur — 143/2019

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,323,324,34, 504,506149. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADW400002992019

Filing Number

143/2019

Filing Date

28-May-2019

Registration No

143/2019

Registration Date

28-May-2019

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDGOL

Judge

302-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

48

Police Station

GUDAGERI PS

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,148,323,324,34, 504,506149

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GUDAGERI PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ABDULREHAMAN BABAJAN MULLA Advocate - G B Soratur

  2. 2.NISARAHAMADED BABAJAN MULLA

  3. 3.MUNAFF URF MUNAFSAB BABAJAN MULLA

  4. 4.MAHAMMADGOUSE BABAJAN MULLA

  5. 5.MANSURAHAMAD BABAJAN MULLA

  6. 6.INUSALI URF VINUSALI MUNAAF URF MUNAFSAB MULLA

  7. 7.SADIQ MOHAMMDGOUSE MULLA

  8. 8.HASHAMTBEE URF HASAMBEGUM BABAJAN MULLA

  9. 9.SHAHEERA URF SAHARABANU NILSSARAHAMAD MULLA

  10. 10.AFRIN URF SAHARABANU ABDULREHMAN MULLA

  11. 11.REHAMATABEE URF RAHAMATBEE MANSURAHAMD MULLA

  12. 12.SHAHEERA URF SAHARABANU MUNAF URF MUNAFSAB MULLA

  13. 13.SHAHEERA MOHAMADDGOUD MULLA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: Criminal Case 143/2019 Court Decision: All 12 accused persons (Accused 1-11 and 13) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506 r/w Section 149. The court found the criminal proceedings were rooted in an underlying civil property dispute and constituted an abuse of legal process. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that multiple key prosecution witnesses turned hostile; critical eye-witnesses deposed about the existence of a civil dispute between parties; the doctor testified injuries were 1-2 days old (inconsistent with the alleged incident date); and pancha witnesses admitted the civil nature of the dispute. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that criminal law cannot be misused merely to settle civil disputes when no genuine offense is committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  8. 27-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  11. 13-Feb-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  12. 29-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  13. 17-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  14. 08-Jan-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  15. 23-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 23-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  17. 23-Dec-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  18. 27-Nov-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  19. 05-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  21. 26-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  22. 04-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  23. 26-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  24. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  25. 17-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  26. 12-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  27. 07-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  28. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  29. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  30. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  31. 24-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  32. 09-Oct-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  33. 09-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  34. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  35. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  36. 07-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  37. 07-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  38. 16-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  39. 25-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  40. 07-Dec-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  41. 13-Oct-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  42. 24-Aug-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  43. 07-Jul-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  44. 25-May-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  45. 09-Mar-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  46. 19-Jan-2023

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  47. 25-Nov-2022

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  48. 22-Sep-2022

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  49. 24-Aug-2022

    Await Report/Order/Summons/Notice

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  50. 28-Jul-2022

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  51. 23-Jun-2022

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  52. 12-May-2022

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  53. 19-Mar-2022

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  54. 18-Mar-2022

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  55. 27-Jan-2022

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  56. 20-Nov-2021

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  57. 30-Sep-2021

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  58. 17-Sep-2021

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  59. 17-Aug-2021

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  60. 29-Jun-2021

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  61. 13-May-2021

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  62. 26-Mar-2021

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  63. 18-Feb-2021

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  64. 20-Jan-2021

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  65. 23-Dec-2020

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  66. 05-Nov-2020

    Issue NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  67. 30-Sep-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  68. 23-Sep-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  69. 14-Sep-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  70. 08-Sep-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  71. 28-Aug-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  72. 29-Jun-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  73. 06-Jun-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  74. 16-May-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  75. 06-Mar-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  76. 24-Jan-2020

    Charge

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  77. 27-Dec-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  78. 11-Oct-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  79. 13-Sep-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  80. 09-Aug-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  81. 18-Jul-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  82. 26-Jun-2019

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Kundgol

  83. 28-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 28-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Criminal Case 143/2019 Court Decision: All 12 accused persons (Accused 1-11 and 13) were acquitted of charges under IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324, 341, 504, 506 r/w Section 149. The court found the criminal proceedings were rooted in an underlying civil property dispute and constituted an abuse of legal process. Key Reasoning: The judge determined that the prosecution failed to prove the allegations beyond reasonable doubt. The court noted that multiple key prosecution witnesses turned hostile; critical eye-witnesses deposed about the existence of a civil dispute between parties; the doctor testified injuries were 1-2 days old (inconsistent with the alleged incident date); and pancha witnesses admitted the civil nature of the dispute. Citing Supreme Court precedent, the court held that criminal law cannot be misused merely to settle civil disputes when no genuine offense is committed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case