SMT POORNIMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR MATHAD vs NIL — 11/2026
Case under --- Section u/sec 7. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 23rd March 2026.
G and WC - Appointment Of Guardian, Other
CNR: KADW310000312026
e-Filing Number
17-01-2026
Filing Number
1/2026
Filing Date
17-Jan-2026
Registration No
11/2026
Registration Date
21-Jan-2026
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KALGHATAGI
Judge
1219-Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Kalghatagi
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT POORNIMA W/O SHIVAKUMAR MATHAD
Adv. MALAPUR NIRMALA ISHWARAPPA
-
2.PRATHAM S/O SHIVAKUMAR MATHAD
Adv. MALAPUR NIRMALA ISHWARAPPA
-
3.RAJSHEKHARAYYA S/O SHANKARAYYA MATHAD
Adv. MALAPUR NIRMALA ISHWARAPPA
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
DecreeView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Senior Civil Judge of Kalaghatagi appointed Smt. Poornima as legal guardian of her minor son Pratham and authorized her to sell jointly-owned agricultural property (3.26 acres) to meet the family's maintenance, medical, and education expenses following her husband's death in February 2024. The court found no conflicting interests between guardian and minor, and ordered the sale proceeds be utilized solely for the minor's benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Kalghatagi
-
18-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Kalghatagi
-
16-Mar-2026
Orders
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Kalghatagi
-
26-Feb-2026
Await Final Report
Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Kalghatagi
-
24-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2026
The Senior Civil Judge of Kalaghatagi appointed Smt. Poornima as legal guardian of her minor son Pratham and authorized her to sell jointly-owned agricultural property (3.26 acres) to meet the family's maintenance, medical, and education expenses following her husband's death in February 2024. The court found no conflicting interests between guardian and minor, and ordered the sale proceeds be utilized solely for the minor's benefit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts