SMT. IRAVVA W/O YALLAPPA SHANBHENAVAR vs IRAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KAMADOLLI — 15/2023
Case under Order 20 Rule 18 Cpc. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 28th March 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KADW300021472023
Filing Number
15/2023
Filing Date
12-Oct-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
12-Oct-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KALGHATAGI
Judge
301-Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
Decision Date
28-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SMT. IRAVVA W/O YALLAPPA SHANBHENAVAR
Adv. V.B.SHIVANGOUDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.IRAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
2.MANJAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
3.CHANABASAPPA S/O SHIVAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
4.SMT. SHASHIKALA S/O SHIVAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
5.SOMALINGAPPA S/O NINGAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
6.SMT. CHANABASAVVA W/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA HOSAVAKKAL
-
7.SMT. MAHADEVI W/O BASAPPA GOPALI
-
8.SMT. MAHADEVI W/O GURULINGAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
9.SRI IRAPPA S/O GURULINGAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
10.SMT. RATNAVVA W/OGURULINGAPPA KAMADOLLI
-
11.BASAMMA W/O IRAPPA KITTUR
-
12.MAHANTESH S/O GURULINGAPPA KAMADOLLI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: FDP No. 15/2023 Court Decision: The Civil Judge allowed petitioner Smt. Iravva's petition to finalize property partition. Based on a preliminary decree from 2023 entitling her to 1/2 share (not 1/5 as stated in petition), the court accepted the Court Commissioner's demarcation report and allotted specific property blocks to the petitioner and four respondents as detailed in the attached survey sketch. Key Reasoning: The respondents failed to appear, the Commissioner's feasibility report showed practicable partition with defined metes and bounds, and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, making it just and necessary to execute the final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
24-Mar-2026
For Orders
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
18-Mar-2026
For Orders
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
10-Mar-2026
For Orders
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
17-Feb-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
20-Jan-2026
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
05-Jan-2026
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
20-Nov-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
23-Sep-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
04-Aug-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
03-Jul-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
03-Jun-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
21-Feb-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
16-Jan-2025
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
28-Nov-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
22-Oct-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
30-Sep-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
29-Aug-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
09-Jul-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
07-Jun-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
27-Mar-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
14-Feb-2024
Await Commissioner Report
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
19-Jan-2024
Hearing
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
18-Jan-2024
For Orders
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
06-Dec-2023
Steps
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
31-Oct-2023
Steps
Civil Judge and JMFC , Kalghatgi
-
13-Oct-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Oct-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 15/2023
Case Summary: FDP No. 15/2023 Court Decision: The Civil Judge allowed petitioner Smt. Iravva's petition to finalize property partition. Based on a preliminary decree from 2023 entitling her to 1/2 share (not 1/5 as stated in petition), the court accepted the Court Commissioner's demarcation report and allotted specific property blocks to the petitioner and four respondents as detailed in the attached survey sketch. Key Reasoning: The respondents failed to appear, the Commissioner's feasibility report showed practicable partition with defined metes and bounds, and the petitioner accepted the report without objection, making it just and necessary to execute the final decree accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts