CHANDRAHAS S/O PRAVEEN GUDIHAL vs PRAVEEN S/O ASHOK GUDIHAL Advocate - S.R.NADAF — 296/2025
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 Cpc. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KADW200017752025
Filing Number
299/2025
Filing Date
24-Jun-2025
Registration No
296/2025
Registration Date
24-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUBBALLI
Judge
293-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHANDRAHAS S/O PRAVEEN GUDIHAL
Adv. S.M.KENCHANAGOUDRA
-
2.RAJANANDINI D/O PRAVEEN GUDIHAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRAVEEN S/O ASHOK GUDIHAL Advocate - S.R.NADAF
-
2.ASHOK S/O YALLAPPA GUDIHAL
-
3.THE MINISTRY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAY R/B ITS SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER DHARWAD
-
4.THE CHIEF SECRETARY OF THE CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, MINIRTY OF ROAD TRANSPORT AND HIGHWAYS, NEW DELHI
Adv. B.P.MATHAPATI
Case History
-
07-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Amendment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
04-Jun-2026
Amendment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
03-Jun-2026
Amendment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
28-Apr-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: O.S. No. 296/2025 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint in a partition and declaration suit. The amendment sought to correct typographical errors in the plaint—specifically removing unwanted words from defendant names in paragraphs 6 and 2. The defendants opposed, claiming the application was frivolous, but the court found the amendments necessary for adjudicating the real controversy without altering the suit's nature or cause of action. The application was allowed with costs of Rs. 200, and plaintiffs must file the amended plaint by June 3, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Amendment
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
16-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
09-Apr-2026
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
28-Mar-2026
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
18-Mar-2026
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
11-Mar-2026
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
04-Mar-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
18-Feb-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
03-Feb-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
19-Jan-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
15-Dec-2025
IssueView PDF
-
15-Dec-2025
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
01-Dec-2025
Issues
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
24-Nov-2025
Issues
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
10-Nov-2025
Issues
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
27-Oct-2025
Issues
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
13-Oct-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
12-Sep-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
02-Sep-2025
Written statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
12-Aug-2025
Written statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
04-Aug-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
14-Jul-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
26-Jun-2025
OrdersView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
Summons
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
25-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 296/2025
Case Summary: O.S. No. 296/2025 The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend their plaint in a partition and declaration suit. The amendment sought to correct typographical errors in the plaint—specifically removing unwanted words from defendant names in paragraphs 6 and 2. The defendants opposed, claiming the application was frivolous, but the court found the amendments necessary for adjudicating the real controversy without altering the suit's nature or cause of action. The application was allowed with costs of Rs. 200, and plaintiffs must file the amended plaint by June 3, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts