SRI LINGARAJ FREE BOARDING AND ULAVAPPA AKKI HOSTEL R/B GPA HOLDER ANANDGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL vs SRI UMESH S/O FAKIRAPPA DODDAMANI Advocate - SUDHEENDHRA V PATIL — 17/2025
Case under U/o 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 26. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
Small Cause - Small Cause Suit
CNR: KADW200002512025
Filing Number
17/2025
Filing Date
05-Feb-2025
Registration No
17/2025
Registration Date
05-Feb-2025
Court
PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HUBBALLI
Judge
293-I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRI LINGARAJ FREE BOARDING AND ULAVAPPA AKKI HOSTEL R/B GPA HOLDER ANANDGOUDA S/O BASANAGOUDA PATIL
Adv. BANAD M.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI UMESH S/O FAKIRAPPA DODDAMANI Advocate - SUDHEENDHRA V PATIL
-
2.SRI DHARANENDRA S/O FAKIRAPPA DODDAMANI
Adv. SUDHEENDHRA V PATIL
-
3.SMT DEVAKKAVVA W/O FAKIRAPPA DODDAMANI
Adv. SUDHEENDHRA V PATIL
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Jun-2026
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
17-Jun-2026
Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
15-Jun-2026
Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
11-Jun-2026
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
23-Apr-2026
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
06-Apr-2026
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
18-Mar-2026
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
04-Mar-2026
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
19-Feb-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
11-Feb-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
20-Jan-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: S.C. No. 17/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No.III) under Order III Rule 2 of CPC, permitting the General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder to represent and conduct the eviction suit on behalf of the plaintiff trust. Though the defendant objected that trustees cannot delegate fiduciary duties without prior authority, the court held that GPA representation for case prosecution is permissible under law; questions regarding personal testimony on matters like fraud, limitation, or intention remain evidence issues for trial, not maintainability concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Jan-2026
Evidence12
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
19-Jan-2026
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
14-Jan-2026
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
17-Dec-2025
Orders
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
08-Dec-2025
Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
26-Nov-2025
Arguments
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
11-Nov-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
27-Oct-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
09-Oct-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
16-Sep-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
10-Sep-2025
Hearing
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
02-Sep-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
19-Aug-2025
Objection
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
04-Aug-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
23-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
14-Jul-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
30-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
10-Jun-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
25-Mar-2025
Written statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
24-Feb-2025
Written statement
I Addl Senior CIVIL Judge And JMFC Hubli
-
06-Feb-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 17/2025
Case Summary: S.C. No. 17/2025 The court allowed the plaintiff's application (I.A. No.III) under Order III Rule 2 of CPC, permitting the General Power of Attorney (GPA) holder to represent and conduct the eviction suit on behalf of the plaintiff trust. Though the defendant objected that trustees cannot delegate fiduciary duties without prior authority, the court held that GPA representation for case prosecution is permissible under law; questions regarding personal testimony on matters like fraud, limitation, or intention remain evidence issues for trial, not maintainability concerns. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts