JAFARULLA KHAN S/O NOORULLA KHAN JAHAGIRDAR vs THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NORTH WEST KARNATAKA STATE, ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBBALLI. Advocate - Sri V B Dhavaleshwar — 620/2023

Case under L a Act 1894. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KADW050055712023

Filing Number

620/2023

Filing Date

11-Sep-2023

Registration No

620/2023

Registration Date

15-Sep-2023

Court

PRL.SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, DHARWAD

Judge

284-Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

L a Act 1894

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAFARULLA KHAN S/O NOORULLA KHAN JAHAGIRDAR

    Adv. M.K. ATTAR.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NORTH WEST KARNATAKA STATE, ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBBALLI. Advocate - Sri V B Dhavaleshwar

  2. 2.THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NORTH WEST KARNATAKA STATE, ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, HUBBALLI.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 620/2023 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Dharwad partially allowed the petitioner's compensation claim. The court awarded ₹50,000 with 6% interest per annum from the petition date, rejecting the petitioner's claim of ₹20 lakhs. Key Reasoning: While the court established that a NWKSRTC bus negligently crashed into the petitioner's shed on May 7, 2023, causing damage, it found insufficient evidence of the claimed losses. The petitioner's trade license expired in 2015 and wasn't renewed, casting doubt on active business operations at the time of accident. The petitioner failed to produce reliable documentation of stored materials, inventory, or actual damages sustained, relying instead on bare testimony and an irrelevant construction estimate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    Disposed

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  5. 17-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  6. 18-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  7. 26-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  8. 24-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  10. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  11. 28-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  12. 20-Nov-2025

    Judgement

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  13. 28-Oct-2025

    Judgement

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  14. 16-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  15. 16-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  16. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  17. 20-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  18. 16-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  19. 16-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  20. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  21. 28-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  22. 21-Aug-2025

    Referred Lok Adalat

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  23. 14-Aug-2025

    Referred Lok Adalat

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  24. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  25. 05-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  26. 26-Jun-2025

    Referred Lok Adalat

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  27. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  28. 06-May-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  29. 06-May-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  31. 06-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  32. 15-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  33. 15-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  34. 23-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  35. 12-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  36. 28-Nov-2024

    IssueView PDF

  37. 28-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  38. 10-Oct-2024

    Issues

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  39. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  40. 14-Aug-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  41. 12-Jul-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  42. 20-Jun-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  43. 06-Jun-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  44. 18-Apr-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  45. 07-Mar-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  46. 15-Feb-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  47. 11-Jan-2024

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  48. 07-Dec-2023

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  49. 26-Oct-2023

    Objections

    Prl.senior CIVIL Judge and CJM Dharwad

  50. 20-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 11-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 620/2023 Court Decision: The Principal Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Dharwad partially allowed the petitioner's compensation claim. The court awarded ₹50,000 with 6% interest per annum from the petition date, rejecting the petitioner's claim of ₹20 lakhs. Key Reasoning: While the court established that a NWKSRTC bus negligently crashed into the petitioner's shed on May 7, 2023, causing damage, it found insufficient evidence of the claimed losses. The petitioner's trade license expired in 2015 and wasn't renewed, casting doubt on active business operations at the time of accident. The petitioner failed to produce reliable documentation of stored materials, inventory, or actual damages sustained, relying instead on bare testimony and an irrelevant construction estimate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case