R Vishwanatha S/o Ramanna vs Siddeshi P S/o Nunkappa — 1391/2022

Case under Sec. 138 of N.i. Act. Status: EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KADG620027552022

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

20th June 2026

Filing Number

1391/2022

Filing Date

09-11-2022

Registration No

1391/2022

Registration Date

09-11-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR

Judge

256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR

Acts & Sections

Sec. 138 of N.I. Act

Petitioner(s)

R Vishwanatha S/o Ramanna

Adv. B. SHARANAPPA

Respondent(s)

Siddeshi P S/o Nunkappa

Hearing History

Judge: 256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR

08-05-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

09-04-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

04-04-2026

ARGUMENTS- CRIMINAL

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE -CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

28-08-2025
Deposition
28-02-2026
Deposition
13-03-2026
Deposition
08-05-2026
Deposition

Summary of Case 1391/2022 This civil case before the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Jagalur, involved a dispute concerning a check and signature verification. The petitioner's witness (a bank manager) testified that specimen signatures and account opening documents were verified against originals. The respondent's counsel cross-examined, highlighting discrepancies: the check bore the signature "P Siddeshi" in English while specimen documents showed "S.Siddeshprem," and the check was returned for insufficient funds before any signature verification was conducted. The court recorded the testimony and noted contradictions between the check signature and specimen signatures in filed documents. The case was adjourned with no further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1391/2022 This civil case before the First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Jagalur, involved a dispute concerning a check and signature verification. The petitioner's witness (a bank manager) testified that specimen signatures and account opening documents were verified against originals. The respondent's counsel cross-examined, highlighting discrepancies: the check bore the signature "P Siddeshi" in English while specimen documents showed "S.Siddeshprem," and the check was returned for insufficient funds before any signature verification was conducted. The court recorded the testimony and noted contradictions between the check signature and specimen signatures in filed documents. The case was adjourned with no further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case