Kamalamma vs Venkatesha — 171/2018
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 C.p.c Section 7,1. Status: EVIDENCE- CIVIL. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suits
CNR: KADG620015202018
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
171/2018
Filing Date
20-11-2018
Registration No
171/2018
Registration Date
20-11-2018
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR
Judge
256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kamalamma
Adv. M.V.Srinivas
Chaitra
Respondent(s)
Venkatesha
Lakshmana
Nagaraja
Malleshappa
Smt Eramma W/o Hanumanthappa
Smt Anjinamma W/o Late Hanumanthappa S/o Venkatappa
6a) Smt Renukamma W/o Srinivas
6b) Smt Sharadamma S/o Hanumanthapppa
c) Smt Hanumakka W/o Lakesh
d) Venkatesh S/o Hanumanthappa
Smt Sakamma W/o Thimmappa(Legal Heir)
Smt Anjanamma W/o Hanumanthappa S/o Venkatamma
Smt Thippamma W/o Bhimanna S/o Venkatappa
Smt Mallamma W/o Revanna
Hearing History
Judge: 256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 29-04-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 17-02-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case 171/2018 Summary Outcome: The case proceeded with witness examination on 17.02.2026. Petitioner Kamalamma's testimony was recorded regarding her relationship to respondent Chaitra and property claims. The court found insufficient evidence to establish Chaitra's entitlement to the disputed property, as key documents were not properly authenticated and conflicting evidence regarding family relationships emerged during cross-examination. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 171/2018 Summary Outcome: The case proceeded with witness examination on 17.02.2026. Petitioner Kamalamma's testimony was recorded regarding her relationship to respondent Chaitra and property claims. The court found insufficient evidence to establish Chaitra's entitlement to the disputed property, as key documents were not properly authenticated and conflicting evidence regarding family relationships emerged during cross-examination. The matter remains pending for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts