S B Parameshwarappa S/o Basappa vs Smt Sumithramma W/o Late Jayaramappa — 79/2022
Case under Under Order 7 Rule 1 C.p.c. Status: EVIDENCE- CIVIL. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suits
CNR: KADG620012722022
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
72/2022
Filing Date
02-06-2022
Registration No
79/2022
Registration Date
02-06-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, JAGALUR
Judge
256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S B Parameshwarappa S/o Basappa
Adv. E. Onkareshwara
Respondent(s)
Smt Sumithramma W/o Late Jayaramappa
Manjunatha @ Auto Majunath s/o Late Jayaramappa
Madhu @ Auto Madhu S/o Late Jayaramappa
Adv. A.K. PARASHURAMAPPA
Hearing History
Judge: 256-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC JAGALUR
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
EVIDENCE- CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 16-02-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 09-01-2026 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
| 26-11-2025 | EVIDENCE- CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. 79/2022 Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: Witness examination was called and sworn on this date. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had filed an identical property dispute case (O.S. 64/2019) in 2019 against the same respondents, which the petitioner later withdrew. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 on the withdrawn petition. The respondent contended that the petitioner had not paid this cost to the respondents until now. The case concerns ancestral property that was partitioned among the petitioner, respondents, and other family members. The dispute relates to Schedule A property, which is adjacent to a village police station. The hearing of the matter continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. 79/2022 Date: 13.03.2026 Outcome: Witness examination was called and sworn on this date. The respondent's counsel argued that the petitioner had filed an identical property dispute case (O.S. 64/2019) in 2019 against the same respondents, which the petitioner later withdrew. The court imposed a cost of Rs. 2,000 on the withdrawn petition. The respondent contended that the petitioner had not paid this cost to the respondents until now. The case concerns ancestral property that was partitioned among the petitioner, respondents, and other family members. The dispute relates to Schedule A property, which is adjacent to a village police station. The hearing of the matter continues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts